[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Development] Lights, an Idea any comments
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Development] Lights, an Idea any comments
- From: "Mick Furlong" <dorsai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:37:51 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>
> I would strongly advice against that, the Rabbit was going to handle
the
> local control, if you pass that over to a PC you would have no
> control over
> the lights if the pc fell over.
Ahhh
guess I am losing it I thought the PIC would provide local control (shows
what I know;), if it is the Rabbit doing local control then you have my
vote
for 1 rabbit per 8 channels as who wants to lose all their lights if the
rabbit gets a bucket of water over it.
No way would I rely on a PC (running windoze linux or any other damn OS)for
something as critical as lighting.
Mick
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|