[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
- From: "Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:50:44 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Do most people, like me, have conventional aerial co-ax from node 0
> to most (all?) rooms in the house, and place their TiVO's, sat
> decoders etc at node 0? IR superimposed on co-ax makes more sense to
> me than IR over cat5 since it saves wire and sitting an IR reciever
> on top of the telly is the natural place for it.
IR over coax is excellent.
THe disadvantage is the number of bypass kits you need if you go through
distribution amps.
M.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|