[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
- From: "Broadfoot, Kieran J" <Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:46:39 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Ahh multicast... now that could be an interesting option. Well worth
considering.
thanks
kieran
-----Original Message-----
From: patrickl@xxxxxxx [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:20 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
> This would limit us to only 254 addressable devices.
Depends on your netmask, but I take your point.
Maybe in
> the first instance we should use broadcasts and for larger
environments
> build a proxy type device to administer a subnet.
Larger installations could also always use multicast...
Patrick
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|