[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Project] Kbd/LCD device
- From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 13:56:39 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@y..., Ant Skelton <ant@a...> wrote:
> > The second prerequisite is to define the system requirements, and
this
> is a job for the boys in the pointy hats. As far as the interop
protocol
> is concerned, I'd expect these to be things like: will communicate
over
> TCP/IP, will adopt a client-server model, will avoid the use of
> broadcasts etc.
Why are you anti-broadcast? I think it might be just the right thing
in this environment - one message communicates a change in status to
anything that is interested in it - cf. to client-server where each
device has to explicitly register an interest and the server has to
manage a pool of connections.
Patrick
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|