[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Well OT : Post Office
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Well OT : Post Office
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:31:43 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Unfortunately ours did ... but thankfully we managed t get t him before
he
forcibly gained entry. However given that it was he wh had already been
round t drop in the letter originally then he was kind enough (once we'd
explained that Mr. Copeland had left at least two years earlier) t tell us
exactly how he would have gained entry and therefore where the weak/easiest
entry points were in our house.
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 30 July 2001 10:57
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Well OT : Post Office
>
>
> Back in our first flat (which was a rather nasty Repo, in which
> the guy came
> back and kicked all the doors in, thankfully before we moved in)
>
> We lived in complete hope that at least one of the "we are
sending the
> baillifs round" messages for the previous owner would come true.
>
> We figured, if they did forcibly hammer the door down, we would get a
free
> new door whenever the mistake was discovered, and seeing as we needed
and
> couldn't afford a new door on our own.... :)
>
> alas, they baillifs never arrived....
>
> Ian.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "steve" <steve@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Well OT : Post Office
>
>
> Filter them, yes easy - the bin. Or write on them 'Not at this
> address' and
> pop them back in the post box.
>
> We have had this for our current property & a pair of flats i let.
Never
> seen a bailiff yet.
> I imagine they would have t really check the person they want still
owned
> or occupied the property otherwise they would be in serious trouble.
>
>
> Steve.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Phil Harris
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:14 AM
> Subject: [ukha_d] Well OT : Post Office
>
>
> Does anyone know whether the Post Office will filter mail? We get
more
> post for the previous occupants (and not just junk mail) than we
> do for us.
> It's illegal for us t open it t return it or let the senders know
that
> they have moved (IIRC) as we ae not the legal recipients.
>
> One letter we did open (due t the stamping on it saying something
like
> "Final Notice") was the son of the owner prior t the
previous
> owner having
> an outstanding parking ticket that had become a £3,500 fine and
> this was the
> bailiffs telling us they would be gaining entrance t sieze goods
> by legally
> approved force!
>
> We have no forwarding addresses for any of the previous owners
> and so want
> to find some (legal) way of stopping and returning mail for the
previous
> owners.
>
> Phil
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|