The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Group's quiet tonight...


  • To: ukha_d <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Group's quiet tonight...
  • From: Keith Doxey <ukha@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 11:50:26 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Nope...its not just you. It is absolute crap.
 
Its the 56K MP3 version of a TV picture.
 
Because there are only 6 true channels allocated for the 6 Muxes they are cramming so many channels on one Mux that the bitrate is waaaayyyy too low :-((
 
Thats what really pisses me off about Digital TV.
 
It IS capable of perfect pictures with a decent bitrate .......or thousands of channels of worse than Analogue.
 
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 July 2001 11:33
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Group's quiet tonight...

Is it just me or is the actual picture quality of OnDigital absolute shite?
 
It just seems soft and squidgy - the only half-decent channels being the FTA BBC1/BBC2...
 
...I find it amusing when watching - say - Star Trek Next Gen on Sky One that when you get scene cuts that you still have shadowy "ghosts" of the actors from the previous scenes still visible. Watching the "blockies" on some of the movie channels is quite scary and is reminicent of some of the very first MPEG encoding I did seven years ago at my last company!
 
Is this the "better quality digital future" that I heard Chris Smith banging on about earlier this year ... it's scarey t think that it is!
 
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: James Hoye [mailto:james.hoye@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 26 July 2001 10:34
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Group's quiet tonight...

This email was delivered t you by The Free Internet,
a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net

bgColor=#ffffff

 
Didn't think you could do that with On Dogital  It thought if you cancelled subscription then they t ok the box back? 
 
I own my own box - I bought it for 199 when then were 'giving them away' at the launch.  In due course I got a cheque back for 199.  Only condition was (I think) that I had t subscribe for a minimum of 1 year.  A few weeks after that promotion they changed all the terms - they obviously realised that after a year if everyone stopped subscribing they'd have no revenue, and would have 'lost' thousands and thousands of expensive boxes.
 
James H  



____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.