[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
NTL Caller ID was BT caller ID.
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: NTL Caller ID was BT caller ID.
- From: Stuart Poulton <swp@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:06:30 +0100 (BST)
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hello t the Group.
Having followed the discussion relating to CLID, I've investigated futher
the CLID supported by NTL within the midlands, and got the following
response from NTL
"Caller ID is available within Midlands Region.
In Leicester we have a Nortel DMS 100 switch so CLI is supported in the
Bellcore format which is the US standard (different from BT) whereas the
rest of Midlands has GPT switches as per BT standard."
So I'm in a perhaps fortunate situation.
My question is has anyone experience of Bellcore format, and experience of
CLID on NTL ?
Thanks
Stuart
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|