The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Pront or Marantz again


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: Pront or Marantz again
  • From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennethwatt@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:51:38 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Get tips from the master then...Phil!

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave McLaughlin [mailto:dave@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 July 2001 14:16
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Pront  or Marantz again

The Pront -Pro would be nice but I don't think SWMBO will let me go for
that one. It is bad enough just requesting authorisation for the Pront
1Mb...! :o)

Dave...

At 13:59 13/07/01, you wrote:
>i have heard the are the same, but that was about a year ago
>
>i would say stick with the pront , for 4 remotes the 1meg version
>will be find, i think it could handles dozens
>
>go for 2 meg if you want t  d  the cd jukebox thing
>
>or the colour pront  for 700 quid from letsautomate !!!! soon!!!





____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com






____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.