RE: (a bit OT) Video projectors

["Kenneth Watt" <kennethwatt@xxxxxxx>]

Funnily enough my man that knows about such things said that the VPL10
was better but was not worth paying another 2K plus for it over the
MT-1!

Good call Phil.

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 July 2001 23:11
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] (a bit OT) Video projectors

I actually preferred the MT1 t  the VW10HT that I saw at W2FM but I have
subsequently seen a better calibrated VW10 and it was superb ... the MT1
however *IS* a great projector and I was *ALMOST* tempted t  can my
thoughts
of a CRT projector and save myself some money by going for the MT1.

Given that there are some very good VP400QMs out there ... just make
sure
that you get t  see the hours counter on the bulb and check it out for a
green bias ... some of them had a strong green tinge. The advantage of a
second hand one is that you can check them out for dead / stuck pixels
and
they're unlikely t  develop more.

Phil

<SNIPPED THE CRUD THAT WENT BEFORE>



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com






____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/