[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: UKHA usenet group
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: UKHA usenet group
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 23:37:21 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I'm happy with the possibility that I was using a crappy newsreader ...
maybe more recent software would be better.
Newsgroups are most defintely banned at work s that would curtail any
interaction during the day and I just find it easier t have this kind of
thing arriving with my standard email.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hetherington [mailto:mark.egroups@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 July 2001 23:32
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: UKHA usenet group
WRT the comments by both John and Phil about Usenet giving
accessibility t unsavoury groups, IMO this is a potential problem
with the internet in general. Nothing against your own personal
preferences but the potential for abuse did seem an odd argument t
raise so I wondered about it some.
Do both of you not use Usenet at all t attempt t avoid these
issues?
IMO, it is far easier for an inexperienced partner or the kids t
type www.sex.com or merely come across unsavoury items while browsing
sites supported by advertising than t navigate and subscribe to a
Usenet group while it would also be obvious on the next trip t the
computer that this had happened. Usenet programs generally also allow
the locking of the subscription list with a password which stops
anyone but the person with the password subscribing to any other
groups.
Secondly, most Usenet programs allow the saving/archiving of messages
downloaded from newsgroups which is one of your suggested advantages
for the mailing list that I agree with but do not see as a problem in
Usenet.
Finally, Usenet posts are archived by a number of services such as
google (was deja) which long term gives a better protection t the
knowledge base than this group which could lose it's archive t morrow
if Yahoo folded.
Anyway, I respect your opinions and do not want to argue, just
wondered about a few things.
In the event that a newsgroup is created, I would like to investigate
alternative methods t propgate content t those people who are
completely against Usenet maybe by echoing messages from/t the list.
I think an Audiotron group have setup something similar t this with
their forums which can echo to and read from c.h.a. and I know of
another group which run a combined news server/forum system. It
should not be to much of a problem to create an equivalent system t
have a mailing list/usenet feed but until/unless we got the
newsgroup, it is obviously not an immediate need.
Mark.
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|