RE: Re: Video Distribution

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

For CCTV I would just modulate and distribute by RF ... Since I would be
using OnDigital or $ky Digital for TV channels then you can effectively use
the entire RF bandwidth and just tune in channels on your TV for each
different camera.

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: richard.lockyer@xxxxxxx
> [mailto:richard.lockyer@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 July 2001 20:55
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Video Distribution
>
>
> Phil,
>
> Good points, I would als  add CCTV t  the list of distributed
> services, but what box(es) should we use to d  the splitting /
> combining /amplification?
>
> Richard
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "Phil Harris"
<phillip.harris1@v...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ian,
> >
> > As you well know from your various visits I'm looking at d ing
this
> sort of
> > stuff too (and already implementing it using Keiths KAT5's).
> >
> > I tend to look at this kind of thing from a different
> perspective ... the
> > way I look at it is "OK ... it would be nice to pipe the VCR
round
> the house
> > but will it be useable?" The reason for this is a VCR is a
finite
> > entertainment sourc( - just as a single disc DVD player is - and
so
> you have
> > t  stick a tape in there to watch and then run upstairs to watch
> it. If you
> > want to watch a different tape then you have t  come back
> downstairs and
> > swap out the tapes.
> >
> > The devices I see as usefull for distribution aroond the home
would
> be
> > pretty much anything that has a "library" or multi-c
ntent facility
> such as
> > satellite, On Digital boxes, DVD jukeboxes etc. For single play
DVD
> players
> > I woud tend to look at this and say "Well, for £150 I can
get a
> standalone
> > player which will give me extra flexibility" ... the same
applies
> to VCRs
> > where a perfectly reasonable player can be had for about £90.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ian Bird [mailto:I.Bird@xxxxxxx...]
> > > Sent: 01 July 2001 08:41
> > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Video Distribution
> > >
> > >
> > > I was thinking of d ing the same s  would be interested in
your
> > > experiences.
> > > I have an IDTV, DVD and video downstairs and would like to
push
> all this
> > > round the rest of the house.
> > >
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: richard.lockyer@c...
> > > [mailto:richard.lockyer@xxxxxxx...]
> > > Sent: 01 July 2001 00:07
> > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] Video Distribution
> > >
> > >
> > > I currently use a three way splitter / amplifer to
distribute
> video
> > > around the house. I am thinking about upgrading to a Global
> > > communications Loftbox.  Can anyone recommend this or is
there a
> > > better solution?
> > >
> > > Als , Is it possible t  connect more than one KAT 5 receiver
to a
> > > transmitter?
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Automated Home UK
> > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Automated Home UK
> > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/