The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: 12v - 240v Invertors...


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Video Distribution


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Video Distribution
  • From: richard.lockyer@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 14:23:36 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

As all 4 RJ45s in my office are now in use, I may have t  wait until
the switcher is ready.  It's a bit hot in the loft t  start laying
extra runs.

Thanks

Richard

--- In ukha_d@y..., "Keith Doxey" <ukha@d...> wrote:
> You either need purpose installed daisy chained wiring (NOT
recommended) or
> two cables running t  each location where you are having a receiver
home run
> t  your patch panel.
>
> Cable from RJ45 wall socket where TX is located t  Patch Panel.
>
> For Each Intermediate Receiver
> 	Patch cord from <wherever> t  <PatchPanel cable1 t  receiver
RJ45>
> 	<cable1> and <cable2> terminate on SAME RJ45 Socket
> 	<PatchPanel cable2 from receiver RJ45>
> Next
>
> Finally Patchcord t  socket for final reciever (ONLY SINGLE CABLE)
>
> Use short patch cords from wall socket t  each receiver
> Intermediate receivers need the termination resistors removing
> End receiver MUST be terminated.
>
> Please bear in mind that KAT5 was designed as Point-Point not
multidrop but
> I have experimented with multiple receivers on one transmitter and
using 4
> receivers on one transmitter everything appeared fine but cannot
guarantee
> that it will be perfect in every case. I was unable t  try with
long lenghts
> of cable. Once the switcher is available you can then revert t
Point-Point
> links.
>
> Keith
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: richard.lockyer@c...
> > [mailto:richard.lockyer@xxxxxxx...]
> > Sent: 01 July 2001 09:44
> > To: ukha_d@y...
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Video Distribution
> >
> >
> > How would the daisy chaining be implemented with just one RJ-45
> > socket on the unit? Would there be any reduction in quality?
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > --- In ukha_d@y..., "Keith Doxey" <ukha@d...>
wrote:
> > > KAT5 - yes with a slight modification t  the receiver which
involves
> > > removing 4 resistors. The cable MUST be daisy chained t  the
> > receivers
> > > though, NOT star wired.
> > >
> > > Keith
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: richard.lockyer@c...
> > > > [mailto:richard.lockyer@xxxxxxx...]
> > > > Sent: 01 July 2001 00:07
> > > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > > Subject: [ukha_d] Video Distribution
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I currently use a three way splitter / amplifer to
distribute
> > video
> > > > around the house. I am thinking about upgrading t  a
Global
> > > > communications Loftbox.  Can anyone recommend this or
is
there a
> > > > better solution?
> > > >
> > > > Also, Is it possible t  connect more than one KAT 5
receiver
t  a
> > > > transmitter?
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________________________________
> > > > Automated Home UK
> > > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > > ____________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________
> > Automated Home UK
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > ____________________________________
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.