Re: Epods Terminal Server

[andy.powell@xxxxxxx]

Thanks for the info, I installed Win2k Server last night only to find that
the serivce requires more licences! I think I'll drop back to NT4TS. I was
running over a serial ppp link and it still seems faster than using the
epods direct!! /Can't wait for my Orinoco kit to arrive.

Please, please let us know about the Orinoco stuff.. any problems, range,
etc - even though some of us are waiting for it to arrive it is still
interresting to get someone else's experiences...

A.

(Not wirelessly sent not from an Epods ;-) )




REB.Barnett@xxxxxxx
26/01/2001 09:10
Please respond to ukha_d


To:     ukha_d@xxxxxxx
cc:
Subject:        [ukha_d] Epods Terminal Server

Following on from the Terminal Server thread...

I've installed Win NT4 Terminal Server to my spare machine: a lowly P120
with 48MB RAM. It runs an absolute dream. Admittedly I've only used two
concurrent connections, running a few instances of IE5.5, but still,
that's
all I really want to do with the ePOD.

But anyway, just wanted to point out that you don't necessarily need
expensive kit to run TS4 (W2K is probably a different matter), and also to
point out the irony that a P120 can run NT, run IE5.5, and serve terminal
desktops, all much more quickly than the 120MHz RISC processor in the ePOD
can render a single page...

Ray Barnett.

p.s. Is anyone actually interested in a review of the Orinoco kit - sounds
like most people interested are already enjoying it / about to enjoy it?












*********************** DISCLAIMER **************************
This message is intended only for use by the person
to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
not constitute a formal commitment by Lombard Odier.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
kindly notify the sender immediately and destroy this
message. Thank you.
*************************************************************