[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: X10 in Loo
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: X10 in Loo
- From: "Phillip Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 20:21:33 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I understand that it is possible for some of the newer modules to respond
to
a status request giving their current status.
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tracey.gardner [mailto:tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 5:29 PM
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] X10 in Loo
>
>
>
> Hi Phil
>
> I haven't got any X10 yet but my extremely limited knowledge
> led me to understand that the units didn't signal back their status.
> Have things changed and is there some form of handshaking then?
>
> Tracey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Date: 18 January 2001 17:15
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] X10 in Loo
>
>
> >
> >Hmmm ... even my crappy ActiveHome X10 setup is able to read the
status
> of
> >the X10 modules that I have when I load up the software.
> >
> >I would have thought that Marks much more sophisticated HomeVision
> system
> >would have no problems...
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|