The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Plus.Net NAT problems?



Haven't noticed this but then I'm not a gamer.  Generally my main PC is
downloading stuff while others are doing email or other low bandwidth
tasks.

Be interested to hear the reply you get from support.

M.


----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Lowe <ian@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:44 AM
Subject: [ukha_d] Plus.Net NAT problems?


> I am having increidble problems with using NAT on Plus.NET It works,
in
> that any machine can connect out and get the full bandwidth, however,
> as soon as more than one host is talking, the bandwidth absolutely
> floors.
>
> As an example, using that tried and tested network testing tool,
Unreal
> Tournament... If I am playing online, I get a ping of about 130ms. If,
> however, my wife starts playing as well, both of our pings rise to
> around the 3000ms mark. even popping open a web page when someone else
> is playing causes spikes of >1000ms ping.
>
> This doesn't happen on BT Internet, or even on Freeswerve. I have
> mailed support, but I am wondering if any of you guys on Plus.NET have
> encountered this problem? and more importantly, found a solution?
>
> As an aside, I have tried this with both Winroute PRO, and Windows
2000
> RRAS with NAT, with exactly the same result.
>
> Ian.
>
> =====
> >+++
> Ian R Lowe. Director, Wintermute Consultancy Ltd.
> e-mail: ian@xxxxxxx
> Onward and Upward! Towards Ascension!
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
>






Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.