[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: ePOD Development
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: ePOD Development
- From: "Phillip Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:44:20 -0800
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I had the same attitude when I had a cablemodem when I lived in Farnham ...
out here in the sticks though I'm still waiting for NTL to get their act
sorted out and the service implemented. At least that's only £20 a month
now
which is a damn good deal.
If BT could sort out their ADSL service round here then maybe I'd consider
that too ... however since they spent so long insisting that I couldn't get
Home Highway as my local exchange didn't support it - when what I was
trying
to arrange was for them to *REMOVE* the existing Home Highway equipment in
this house and just fit us a standard analogue line (£50 a month for Home
Highway is highway robbery so I decided not to keep it) then they quite
obviously still don't know their a*rse from their elbow!
Phil
(Wishing ... for internet access at least ... that I hadn't moved out of my
old house!)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 11:57 AM
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ePOD Development
>
>
> Why would I use a modem when I've got ADSL? I'm going to download
600Mb
> later tonight. The host is fast so I'll get 59-60Kb/sec :) Not bad for
> ?40/mo!
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 January 2001 03:49
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ePOD Development
>
> Has anyone actually tried downloading this on a modem?
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Des Gibbons [mailto:des@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 11:50 AM
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ePOD Development
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > thanks for the link... I haven't downloaded it but from what
> > I've read you
> > will need your
> > > own copies of C and/or VB - these are just addon kits for
them.
> >
> > > A.
> >
> > The eMbedded Visual Tools include eMbedded Visual BasicR and
> > eMbedded Visual
> > C++R, including SDKs for the Pocket PC, Palm-size PC, and
> Handheld PC. The
> > eMbedded Visual Tools are the successor to the separate Windows
> > CE Toolkits
> > for VC++ and VB. This version is standalone and does not require
Visual
> > Studio.
> >
> > DesG
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|