[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: URGENT : Ideas Wanted
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: URGENT : Ideas Wanted
- From: "Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 17:12:18 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>
>How much would a non-identification system be useful? I'm thinking
>of a method which should work well where people aren't moving around
>and triggering PIRs- but it doesn't differentiate between people.
>
>Personally, I'd rather not have a biometric or badge system, at
>least until it can treat any possible visitor fairly too without them
>having to be 'tagged'.
>
>Might anyone be interested in the above?
>
YES YES!!
Like I was saying, the ID feature is an "ideal", it is still VERY
useful to
have just a simple (but effective & reliable) occupancy sensor.
Paul G.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|