Re: PBXs

["Alancc" <alan.cc@xxxxxxx>]

I don't think Calum has seen the cost of making off fibre ends or the price
of kit to go onto them!!!

Alancc
----- Original Message -----
From: Keith Doxey <ukha@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 8:50 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] PBXs


> Are you suggesting Fibre INSTEAD of CAT5?
>
> What do you have that will currently work over fibre?
>
> I have lots that works over CAT5.
>
> Fibre is extremely high bandwith, but CAT5 can now handle Gigabit
ethernet.
> At the same time, all the previous high bandwidth users such as
streamed
> video, are shrinking in size due to faster PC's and improved
compression
> techniques.
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calum Morrell [mailto:calum@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 30 December 2001 18:44
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] PBXs
>
>
> Shouldn't we forward thinking chappies [ and chappettes :-) ] be
saying
> "screw cat5, I use fibre" to ensure a little bit more life
in our
> systems than cat5 can offer?
>
>
> Calum [ not looking at 'im who's just laid over 7km's of cat5 >:) ]
>
> Stuart Grimshaw wrote:
>
> >On Saturday 29 December 2001 19:49 pm, Timothy Morris wrote:
> >
> >>The BIG advantage is that it will handle 8 cordless extensions
without
> >>ANY CAT5!
> >>
> >
> >lol, I think we've found the Anti-CAT5, someone check the back of
his
head
> >for a tiny "2.4GHz" birthmark.
> >
> >:-)
> >
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>