RE: PBXs

["Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>]

Are you suggesting Fibre INSTEAD of CAT5?

What do you have that will currently work over fibre?

I have lots that works over CAT5.

Fibre is extremely high bandwith, but CAT5 can now handle Gigabit ethernet.
At the same time, all the previous high bandwidth users such as streamed
video, are shrinking in size due to faster PC's and improved compression
techniques.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Calum Morrell [mailto:calum@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 30 December 2001 18:44
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] PBXs


Shouldn't we forward thinking chappies [ and chappettes :-) ] be saying
"screw cat5, I use fibre" to ensure a little bit more life in our
systems than cat5 can offer?


Calum [ not looking at 'im who's just laid over 7km's of cat5 >:) ]

Stuart Grimshaw wrote:

>On Saturday 29 December 2001 19:49 pm, Timothy Morris wrote:
>
>>The BIG advantage is that it will handle 8 cordless extensions
without
>>ANY CAT5!
>>
>
>lol, I think we've found the Anti-CAT5, someone check the back of his
head
>for a tiny "2.4GHz" birthmark.
>
>:-)
>




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/