[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Remote Controls
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Remote Controls
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 17:37:29 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Graham,
I use both and, other than very slight differences in software and
cosmetics, they are one and the same. Both highly recommended!
HTH
K.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Butler [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 December 2001 17:24
> To: UKHA_D
> Subject: [ukha_d] Remote Controls
>
> Hi folks,
>
> As we all know, the best thing about Christmas shopping is buying
things
> for
> yourself in the middle of spending for others :-)
>
> So, to that end, I'm treating myself to a learning remote. However,
my
> question is, which and why? The Pronto seems to be the most popular
> choice
> but what does that have over the Marantz ? I can stretch to the
Marantz's
> price (and therefore the 2MB Pronto) but do I need the extra memory
both
> provide, bearing in mind I'm going to want to control a TV, video, DVD
&
> amp
> and X10 stuff in the future. Are there any other viable units around?
>
> If I only had the cash for the colour Pronto, these questions wouldn't
> arise
> :-)
>
> Oh, and my amp and DVD are champagne so the Marantz would look nice,
but
> it's not a huge concern.
>
> Any thoughts appreciated
>
> G
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|