The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: House wiring - follow up


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: House wiring - follow up
  • From: Mike Griffiths <mike@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 09:41:36 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Very true=20
If you use shielded Cat5 for the HomeVision Temp sensors you can gat into
problems with the cable
Capacity increases I think is the main cause
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Fri 21 Dec 01 09:05
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] House wiring - follow up

A friend of a friend runs a cable company in Basingstoke and he reckons
that using shielded cable without the accompanying hardware actually
*REDUCES* the effectiveness of the network as the shielding on the
cables - unless correctly terminated - as the shielding alters the
electrical characteristics of the cable. (So I'm told.)

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham P. Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: 21 December 2001 09:00
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] House wiring - follow up
>=20
>=20
> You also need shielded patch panels and shielded ports, it=20
> can get rather expensive to go down that route. As Phil says,=20
> there is no need for shielding in many environments. I have=20
> CCTV being sent down unshielded CAT5 without any problem.
>=20=20
> Regards
>=20=20
> Graham
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 December 2001 08:19
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] House wiring - follow up
>=20
>=20
> But CAT5e isn't shielded ... just as CAT5 isn't shielded. As=20
> you have just said, STP *IS* shielded but that's not what you said.
>=20=20
> Anyone just coming into this could have gone off to buy a=20
> roll of CAT5e and then think they've been screwed because it=20
> wasn't shielded ... plus of course to take advantage of the=20
> shielded CAT5 you have to use shielded plugs too. There is no=20
> need (unless you are in a really electrically noisy=20
> environment) to use shielded CAT5/CAT5e.
>=20=20
> Phil
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: simon rafferty [mailto:musashi1977uk@xxxxxxx]=20
> Sent: 21 December 2001 01:21
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] House wiring - follow up
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>   Phil Harris <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx> wrote:=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> My only advice is use CAT5e (shielded) for your CAT5. Where=20
> you think you will need 2 cables run at least 3.=20
>=20=20
> <<CAT5e is not shielded.>>=20
>=20=20
> It is if you use STP cable rather than yhe UTP kind
>=20=20
> What is the easiest way to cut out for the back> boxes ? are=20
> there tools to make life easier and can> they be hired ?The=20
> easiest way to cut back boxes is using a back box cutter=20
> (ELECTRICAL BOX SINKER ) from screwfix
> (www.screwfix.com/) but it will cost you =A385.00 icl VAT and=20
> you will need to beg, borrow or hire and SDS drill with=20
> roto-stop..but let me asure you after cutting 30 or 40 back=20
> boxes by hand (taking upto 20 mins
> each) you will wish you had purchased on of these, they do=20
> make life easy!! http://www.screwfix.com/PICTURES/6114.jpg
> <http://www.screwfix.com/PICTURES/6114.jpg>=20=20
>=20=20
> <<If you have plasterboard walls then a "RotoSaw"
(=A399 from=20
> Homebase) makes cutting the cutouts for dry lining boxes a
breeze...>>
>=20=20
> Phil
>=20
>=20
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
> <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/>=20=20
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of=20
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>   _____=20=20
>=20
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalised at My=20
> <http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/mail_uk/my?http://uk.my.yahoo.com>
Yahoo!.=20
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
> <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>=20=20
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of=20
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo!=20
> Groups Sponsor=09
>=20
> ADVERTISEMENT
>=20=20
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=3D212196.1774496.3293435.1456760/D=3Degroupweb/S=3D1=
705
041992:HM/A=3D894754/R=3D0/*http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/N2663.yahoo/B403=
1
4.14;sz=3D300x250;ord=3D1008922758?>=20=09
=20
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=3D212196.1774496.3293435.1456760/D=3Degro=
u
pmail/S=3D1705041992:HM/A=3D894754/rand=3D939302341>=20=09

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>=20=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.=20




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20





For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.