RE: Re: LW11G ??

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

Title: Message

Sounds like that's exactly what you would do...

 

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Cook [mailto:g@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gareth Cook
Sent: 17 December 2001 14:24
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Fw: [ukha_d] Re: LW11G ??

My hall switch is now connected to a 100W wire-wound transformer (i rerouted it)

The current switch has a live in, then goes back out in line - the black cables (neutral yes ?) are joined together - so would i have to break into this ?

G.

Gareth Cook Senior Engineering Specialist EMEA ED, IBM SWG Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG

Office:  +44 (0) 1784 445 166 Mobile:  +44 (0) 7980 445 166 Fax:      +44 (0) 1784 499 166

Work: g@xxxxxxx Personal: g@xxxxxxx AIM Chat : TheBoyG

----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/UK/IBM on 17/12/2001 14:20 -----

Discussion
Main Topic

"Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
Today 13:26

.

Subject: .	RE: [ukha_d] Re: LW11G ?? .
Category:

You should already have a live loop to the existing switch ... You
therefore need to get a neutral feed down to the LW11 from the rose.
Alternatively you could pull through a three core and earth cable which
would do the job.

Unless anyone else can think of another way to obtain a neutral return
using the existing wiring provision of course....

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: edwards_sj [mailto:edwards_sj@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 17 December 2001 13:23
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: LW11G ??
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@v...> wrote:
>
> > In so far as you need a neutral then yes ... It is physically
> > compatible.
>
> What's the easiest way to retro-fit these then assuming that I have a
> standard wall switch at present, ie. power to the rose, then a live
> loop to the switch.
>
> Steve
>
>
>