RE: Re: Telephone to CAT5 Patching

["Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>]

I have seen mention in other places thet whilst the RJ11 will fit into the
RJ45 socket, the body of the plug can damage the other connectors of the
RJ45 leading to intermittant connection problems in the future when used
for
RJ45's.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Des Gibbons [mailto:des@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 August 2001 10:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Telephone to CAT5 Patching
>
>
>
> I've seen a few people mentioning putting RJ45's on phone leads,
> it might be
> a better idea to use RJ-11's they fit into an RJ45 socket, but are
still
> sort of standard, or just buy your phones from a place that uses
RJ11's,
> usual disclaimer about BABT approval etc etc yadda yadda ;)
>
>
> DesG
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 26 August 2001 12:16
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Telephone to CAT5 Patching
> >
> >
> > I use these too, but they came free from a 'dubious' source so
I'm glad
> > Brian actually knew where to get them legit. They do work really
> > well, but I
> > am considering put RJ45 plugs on the phones anyway as it is a
> bit neater.
> >
> > Graham
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>