----- Forwarded by Gareth
Cook/STA/Lotus on 24/08/2001 09:29 -----
Discussion Main Topic
"Mark McCall"
<mark@xxxxxxx> Yesterday 17:36
.
Subject: .
Re: [ukha_d] Is an iPaq the ONLY
alternative to the gold dust that is an ePod ? .
Category:
This is what I'm readying my iPAQ for Gareth
- oh ye of the largest signature :-)
I have a wirless PCMCIA card and sleeve for
the iPAQ and I'm waiting for the AP to arrive. It's is bulky and to
be honest the LinkSys card has a pretty damn ugly aerial that sticks out of
the sleeve. I have seen much more rounded ones that are nicer to look
at. You can also get 802.11b wireless CF sized cards for the thinner
CF sleeve but as it doesn't have the extra battery I don't know how long it
would last.
Will take a pic if you want.
M.
----- Original Message -----
From:Gareth Cook/STA/Lotus To:ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Is an iPaq the ONLY alternative
to the gold dust that is an ePod ?
I would like wireless browser access in my lounge - without the neded to
whip out the laptop.
Even with an iPaq - are they capable of taking a wireless pc card ? if so -
does it make it "bulky" ?
For the love of god - will there ever be a product !!
G.
Gareth Cook
Senior Engineering Specialist
EMEA EDT, IBM SWG
Lotus Park, Staines, TW18 3AG
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use
this contact form
. Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control
over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed
to the relevant mailing list.