[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: TS was Interface design choices?...
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: TS was Interface design choices?...
- From: "Andy Powell" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:09:50 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> I take it to get the ICA protocol you are running your NT4 TSE with
> Metaframe 1.8 installed then ?
Yes, but I've also got remote admin on my Win2k box.
> And are you running your NT4 as a Domain controller ? , Cos here
and in
Yes, the only real reason is because I haven't got around to looking
at Active Directory services on the Win2k box. I needed a domain
controller because on one of the win98 boxes I needed to be able to
use dcomcfg.
> Marks we are only running them as member servers, and in the TS
client you
> HAVE to enter the domain, although come to think of it I never
tried the
> workgroup name.... hmmmm, must try that.
I don't have that problem, but I get the feeling that the workgroup
may just work, although you wouldn't (unless you've opened up you
servers) be able to get access to the server resouces without a
user/pass (but only if you have a domain)
Andy
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|