[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: BIK sensor - WAS moving away from the remote-control paradigm
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: BIK sensor - WAS moving away from the
remote-control paradigm
- From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:22:23 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
1: How much are they going to be?
2: Can I fit them on the BACK of a bookcase, to cover a room? If so -
I'm laughing - I have a large number of bookcases ;-)
Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher
************************************************************************
****
Kingfisher plc
Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5PX
Registered in England, Number 1664812
This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed
and
may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary,
any
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the
official view of the company. If you have received this e-mail in
error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message
from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your
co-operation.
************************************************************************
****
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 10 August 2001 10:04
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] BIK sensor - WAS moving away from the
remote-control paradigm
Excellent news Ian! - I'm encouraged!...
Keep us posted with the results...
Cheers.
Paul G.
>From: "Ian B" <Ian@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: [ukha_d] BIK sensor - WAS moving away from the remote-control
>paradigm
>Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 08:22:21 +0100
>
> > 1) They are not here! - they are just vapourware at the moment...
>
>They are closer than you think. I have three of the originals and made
>Stuart the PCB for his soldering practice. As Stuart said he is 95%
there.
>
> > 2) I >believe< their effectiveness is dependant on having
loads of
>aerials
>
>There are two aerials that are best sited at about three feet high.
These
>can even be the tin foil burglar strip you see stuck to windows in
shops
>etc. - great behind wall paper or even thick paint. Furniture moving
like
>chairs, tables etc. doesn't necessitate a recalibration but large metal
>objects can e.g. fridge freezers might. More than one unit can be used
in a
>room without problems which is good as they are more accurate with less
>area
>covered. A good house earth is the only thing that is not really
obvious
>but
>essential.
>
> > 3) even if both of the above are solved, - there is no
demonstrable
>proof
> > that they will work, so until I've seen one in operation, and
it's
been
> > demonstrated to work, then I'll reserve judgement, and not get my
> > hopes up too high...
>
>I have had one working at home in a test environment and it was brill.
I
>ran
>into sensitivity problems when I went for a large room 14' X 18' and L
>shaped. The answer is two sensors and sort out my house earth which is
>awful!!
>
>HTH
>
>Ian
>
_________________________________________________________________
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|