The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: [OT] Camcorders


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cheap 19" Rack


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Cheap 19" Rack
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:29:31 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Do CPC have a web site with an online catalogue? My Hifi rack is somewhat full at teh moment...
 
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cockerton [mailto:alancc@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 29 April 2001 10:33
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: [ukha_d] Cheap 19" Rack

Reading about Grahams patch panel reminds me of a posting I have been meaning to make.
 
A full 6ft height 19" rack with three heavy duty shelves and casters for just over £70.00 plus the Vat mans bit.
 
CPC sell the bits:-
 
6 no EN55994
3 no EN56001
2 no EN55259
4 no EN18614
 
I built one for my node zero, its made up of three shelves with 19" rack profiles up the sides, two 4U plates to add stability and casters on the bottom. It does wobble from side to side a little but its fine when pushed back into a cupboard for support. I was lucky in that when my cupboard was built it turned out exactly the right width to slide the rack in, when I want to work at the back of it I just wheel it forwards. If someone lets me know how I will post a picture, its well worth a look.
 
Alancc


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
www.debticated.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.