[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Now I am *REALLY* hacked off!!!
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Now I am *REALLY* hacked off!!!
- From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 06:11:52 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@h...> wrote:
> >So that premium rate call three months ago has cost me ?
532.50p !!!!
> >
> >I will not be judge and jury yet as I don't know if BTinternet
will do the
> >honourable thing and pay for the call charges yet.
> >
> >John
> >
> >
>
> HAH! - you're kidding aren't you! - BT? that bunch of money-
grabbing,
> feet-dragging, obstructionist, monopolist ***tards
Well normally I'd be amongst the first to BT bash - but I was a bit
confused about John's case.
Surely the router had to be multi-link enabled to bond the two
channels simultaneously? Relying on the ISP to reject bonding
requests so that only one channel is used doesn't seem very sensible.
If this is right then BT can't take all the blame... Or am I barking
up the wrong tree here?
Patrick
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|