The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wiring idea


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Wiring idea
  • From: ewenjc@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:20:52 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I agree that the ideal is to run lots of cable to all locations but
that is not always practical.  Not because of the cost of the cable
but because of the volume of cables and the size of your node 0.

I use the three coax as follows;
One coax is used by NTL Digital Cable,
One coax is used by Terrestrial Arial (only way to get teletext with
NTL) and Modulated CCTV,
One coax is for distribution, i.e. output from Cable via Video.

If you have a way to do this with two cables I'd be very interested.
-Ewen

--- In ukha_d@y..., Keith Doxey <ukha.diyha@b...> wrote:
> I did similar when I wired my lounge 16 years ago.
>
> It was a BIG mistake. It means you have unsightly loops of cable
plugged
> into the "unused" sockets. Not too bad if the sofa is in
front of
it but if
> it is on an empty wall it looks a real mess. It also means that if
you need
> 3 cables to node A you have effectively lost both B & C for any
other
> purpose.
>
> Also you are introducing extra terminations in the circuit. Every
connector
> will degrade the signal a little. The less joins the better. As to
CAT5, the
> cable is so cheap its not even worse considering.
>
> A single CT100 with the correct distribution unit at Node 0 can
carry FM, TV
> and SAT.
> 2 CT100 will give you enough for the new Dual LNB Digibox or a
conventional
> digibox and a return uplink.
>
> The only place I can see a need for more than 2 is the MAIN AV
centre.
>
> Just my 0.02
>
> Keith
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ewenjc [mailto:ewenjc@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 13:40
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Subject: [ukha_d] Wiring idea
>
>
> I was re-wiring coax in my lounge last weekend and I had a wiring
idea,
> which I wish I had thought of when I first wired the house.  I'm
emailing
> it, in case any of you had not thought of it.
>
> If you don't know where TV, hifi etc are going to be it is best to
run lots
> of cable to lots of location (always a good idea to run lots of
cable).  I
> have three possible locations for the TV, Cable & HiFi and it
needs
three
> coax, so I'd need to run 9 coax to the lounge and 3 maybe 6 to each
room
> that might have a tv.  I did not have enought time to run this
number of
> cables and I'm not sure the joists would have survived that many
holes.
> Also the patch panel would be massive.
>
> Since the TV can only be in one place in a room, I could have done
the
> following.  If the room has three outlets; run Node0 to A, Node0 to
B, Node0
> to C, A to B, B to C and C to A.  Each outlet has three coax which
can all
> be used by patching together the unused outlets.  If location A has
the TV
> then patch 'Node0 to B' with 'A to B' at location B and 'Node0 to
C' with 'C
> to A'.  This will not work if you use bi-directional cable ;)
>
> This should also work for cat5 but is less useful as devices using
cat5 can
> more easily be spread around the room.
>
> Has anyone done this?
> -Ewen
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.