> -----Original Message-----
>
From: Phillip Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
>
> Nope ... I don't
reckon it's a rip-off as you put it ... the
>
only
issue I
> have with BT was that at the time of
ordering I was told it
> included BT as
> my ISP and it didn't which is no great
problem.
Aside from the misinformation you were given, BT would not
be
allowed to do this under the current regulatory climate! It would be
construed, to put it simply, as anti-competitive behaviour. Blame
Oftel.
> Where I live our phone lines are very bad ... I mean
real
real bad. My
> transfer rates used to be in the
order of 1.5 - 2.0
> kbytes/sec and I
would
> have to try maybe four or five times to get online
before
> being able to
>
successfully connect.
BT are only 'required' to yield 9600bps (I believe) via
analogue modems. This is what is stipulated in the Universal Service
Agreement. Blame Oftel.
> The different departments of BT do not
> talk to each other
> it seems and I
was
bounced all over the place and over about
> 5
different
> phone numbers to simply try to find
out
whether my surftime
> registration had
> gone through!
Again, communication is not straightforward due to
regulatory
compliance. It's no excuse but it does complicate matters.
Blame
Oftel.
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.