[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: BT ISDN + BT Anytime
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: BT ISDN + BT Anytime
- From: "Kaye, Mark" <mark.kaye@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:23:36 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Title: RE: [ukha_d] BT ISDN + BT
Anytime
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
>
> Nope ... I don't reckon it's a rip-off as you put it
... the
> only issue I
> have with BT was that at the time of ordering I was
told it
> included BT as
> my ISP and it didn't which is no great
problem.
Aside from the misinformation you were given, BT would not
be allowed to do this under the current regulatory climate! It would
be construed, to put it simply, as anti-competitive behaviour. Blame
Oftel.
> Where I live our phone lines are very bad ... I mean
real real bad. My
> transfer rates used to be in the order of 1.5 - 2.0
> kbytes/sec and I would
> have to try maybe four or five times to get online
before
> being able to
> successfully connect.
BT are only 'required' to yield 9600bps (I believe) via
analogue modems. This is what is stipulated in the Universal Service
Agreement. Blame Oftel.
> The different departments of BT do not
> talk to each other
> it seems and I was bounced all over the place and
over about
> 5 different
> phone numbers to simply try to find out whether my
surftime
> registration had
> gone through!
Again, communication is not straightforward due to
regulatory compliance. It's no excuse but it does complicate
matters. Blame Oftel.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|