[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- From: Ian Lowe <ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- Timothy Morris <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now will someone answer my original question? Will I get a better
> results from using a separate ripper or will using the CDex front end
> to LAME give good results.
tetch tetch tetch...
:)
The ripper plays no part in ths whatsoever. I have verified (because I
was curious) that a track ripped from CD with Audiocatalyst (which uses
audiograbber) produces a file >identical< to using CDDA32.
It's a digital data stream, and only duff firmware in your CDR Drive
will make a difference.
Ian.
=====
>+++
Ian R Lowe. Director, Wintermute Consultancy Ltd.
e-mail: ian@xxxxxxx
Onward and Upward! Towards Ascension!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|