The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: OT - Network Black Hole?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Home Video Server?


  • To: ukha_d <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Home Video Server?
  • From: Keith Doxey <ukha.diyha@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:35:40 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Not sure, but the maximum that SKY use is around 8Mbits for highly dynamic content like Movies and Sports. Stuff like .tv Living, UKGold etc could be as low as 2Mbit.
 
Even 2 or 3 playback machines shouldnt overly stress a 100M network.
 
Having said that, I wont know until I try and others here will probably reach that stage first.
 
Try one of those DiVx CD's shared over your network to see how well it will play. It might be worth copying it to a hard disc first to eliminate any CD bottlenecks. that would give a fair representation I guess
 
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:25
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d] Home Video Server?

What sort of bandwidth would this take up over your LAN?
 
M.
 
----- Original Message -----
To: ukha_d
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Home Video Server?

Ah ! but.....
 
For a Home Video SERVER, you dont need TV Out.
 
The playback machines would be the ones to use TV Out :-)
 
I have an ATI Rage Fury in my Jukebox PC, and an All In Wonder in my desktop PC but as a PR200 with 4 Gig hard drive its not upto the job of recording video.
 
I am going to head down this route myself later in the year.
 
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Miller [mailto:pmiller@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:01
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Home Video Server?

Looked at doing the same thing myself, my research at my budget levels have led me to look at two cards.
 
The ATI all in wonder Radeon (circa £220), the Hauppauge PVR,
 
ATI AIW:
 
has composite\SVHS TV out
pause TV
SVHS in
Composite IN
TV Tuner
SW encoding
 
Hauppauge PVR:
 
pause TV
SVHS in
Composite IN
TV Tuner
HW MPEG2 encoding
Radio Tuner
Remote Control
 
The Hauppauge looks to suit the best BUT no TV out! aaarrrrggghhhhh....
 
also check out the WDM driver capability, as most software requires WDM drivers to function, limited support under VFW
 
I currently have a Hauppauge theatre something or other, plus a ATI AIW 128 although both capture fine with there native software neither does a watchable capture using the current PVR software I have tried.
 
My feeling is this is early days for this type of software and should be looked at again in 3-6 months...
 
Paul
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 April 2001 11:39
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: [ukha_d] Home Video Server?

Have seen a few movies in DiVx format lately as well as using some of the PVR software I'm considering building some kind of TiVo type server.
 
Anyone got any experience of this?
 
Are there any video cards that do MPEG2 compression in hardware as well as having good quality TV tuner and TV out.
 
Thanks
 
M.
 
 
_________________________________
The UKs Premier Home Automation Site
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
_________________________________


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>
Enter Business Search Term above

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.