[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- From: "Kaye, Mark" <mark.kaye@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:08:53 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Title: RE: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on
DDAR
He's a vinyl addict ;) Nuff Said. Plus, the
kind of music he listens to tends to be well mastered/produced!
M
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ant skelton [mailto:ant@xxxxxxx]
>
> On Monday 02 April 2001 09:59, you wrote:
>
> > next door neighbours _very_ expensive home
stereo set-up.
> This guy is
>
> I really don't get this audiophile thing. You spend
tens of
> thousands of
> pounds on a clinically accurate system that makes 90%
of your
> CDs sound
> absolutely shite, because you can hear all the
mistakes,
> gating, fader noise
> etc.
>
> I played Slayer's "Reign In Blood" on my
mate's 100 grand
> system. It was
> dreadful. Sounded much nicer to me on my 400 quid
equivalent.
> I guess I'm
> lucky that I have cheap taste. ;)
| Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
;) |
|
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|