[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- From: Paul Miller <pmiller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:52:11 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hmmm, I suppose it comes down to, what level of quality each individual
requires, I am happy enough with MP3s going through a =A3500 AV amp, I
believe from the amount of conversations on the list that a fair number
of subscribers use MP3s. very few people have the kit and the ears but
there may be some interest (I suspect minor) in someone's else's view on
the quality they perceive MP3s.
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 02 April 2001 09:41
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on DDAR
Purely out of Academic interest. I've got the kit and the ears to tell.
I
thought you guys would be interested. If not then I won't bother.
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Miller [mailto:pmiller@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 April 2001 09:26
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on DDAR
>
>
> Your second observation came to mind straight away after I read Tims
> reply.
>
> Tim... is there any point in doing the test if you will not use MP3s
> anyway, even if (for example) there is negligible difference at 256K.
>
> What's the test for Tim?
>
> just a thought...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 April 2001 09:19
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on DDAR
>
>
> > Count me out - you know my feelings on mp3 :)
>
> But Tim....the DDAR plays straight .wav files too. Personally the
> convience
> of the system has meant I've heard more of my music that I had done in
a
> long time. Having instant access to all my 4000 tracks (and that's
> small by
> most peoples standards) is fab!
>
> > On a more serious note, I should be in a position to do the blind
test
> on
> > encoding rates later today. I've downloaded the LAME encoder. I
was
> > intending to use it with CDex 1.30, but have read elsewhere that
it
is
> best
> > to rip the CD first. Is that the case or should I be OK with what
I've
> got.
>
> Hmmmm...seems from you statement above that you've already made your
> mind up
> you don't like MP3s before you start these tests.
>
> M.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
=20
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|