[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RG6 vs CT100
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RG6 vs CT100
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 11:37:38 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Bloody Physics!
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: Anders Frihagen [mailto:Anders.Frihagen@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 December 2000 11:07
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RG6 vs CT100
At 10:51 18.12.2000 +0000, you wrote:
>NTL finally got round to installing a Digital TV feed into my house
last
>week.
><SNIP>
>He did say that once NTL launch their interactive service I won't be
able
to
>use it as the CT100 doesn't provide a return path. But I think I'll
just
>wait and see about that...
AH! Another case of uni-directional cable!
Anders
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/977139334/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|