[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RG6 vs CT100
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: RG6 vs CT100
- From: "Michael Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:45:55 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
NTL just installed in my Fathers house on Friday. His newly built house had
Coax and Phones to all the rooms and NTL replaced the cable with their own
RG6 cable. He said it was hastle but that if they didn't replace it then,
if
there were any problems, a supervisor would 'Fail' the install.
BT on the other hand thought that he was moving from his new house back to
his old one and cut the phone off on Thursday! It has only started working
this morning. The NTL install was clean and easy and the guys didn't put a
grey box on the front of the house 'as it would not look good' .
BT: 1 Point
NTL: 9 points
Michael
BELFAST
###############################################
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of
this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the
company, unless specifically stated.
#################################################
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/975923328/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|