The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Memory Was: OT: W2k ICS vs. Linux masquerading


  • To: ukha_d <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Memory Was: OT: W2k ICS vs. Linux masquerading
  • From: Keith Doxey <keith.doxey@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:59:37 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Thanks Darren,

I was planning on upgrading the memory anyway.
I have recently installed a new clock utility that will also monitor
resources

http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen/tclockex.htm

and it shows that I have little or no memory available at any time :-(

The big problem is.....

PR200 64M = 2x32M simms, 2 spare simm slots but suspect.
PR233MX 64M = 2x32M simms, 2 spare simm slots and 2 dimm slots
AMD K6-2-400 = 1x64M Dimm, 2 spare dimm slots.

I will take the Simms out of the PR233 and try them in the PR200 to see if
the simm slots are OK, it kept locking up when I used to have memory in
them
and although the memory subsequently worked in another machine it later
died
:-(

Take the 64M dimm and stick it in the PR233 along with another 16M dimm I
have been given and then buy a shiny new 128Mb PC133 Dimm for the AMD
K6-2-400.

I was looking at memory prices last night and Scan have

128M PC100		49+vat
128M PC133		52+vat
32M EDO Simms	42+vat * 2 = 84+vat :-(

that should give me

PR200	  128M
PR233	  80M
AMD K6  128M

Keith



-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/3/_/2065/_/973857623/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.