Re: Din rail module question

["Mike Huggins" <mikeh@xxxxxxx>]

Er...nope ! :-)

I hear it will have more "stuff" for scenes. But that was all I
was told

I *** HOPE *** that it will have status request, and all the nice stuff
like
that, but we'll have to wait and see

Mike



----- Original Message -----
From: Kiff, Graham <graham.kiff@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 07 August 2000 14:11
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Din rail module question


> Do you know anything more about the new LD12, i.e. specs?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Huggins [mailto:mikeh@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 07 August 2000 13:32
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Din rail module question
>
>
> I understand that there will NEVER really be a LD11. They will stay as
> LD10's (on the outside) but will be LD11's on the inside
>
> There will be a LD12 which will be a complete re-design, but that is
AT
> LEAST 1 year away, if not more
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark McCall <mark@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 05 August 2000 14:03
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Din rail module question
>
>
> > >PS. I can't remember but I'm sure someone said that the
current supply
of
> > >LD10's had the same software as the LD11
> >
> > I have heard this too.
> >
> > Can anyone confirm?  Mike ?
> >
> > M.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



--------------------------------------------------------------------<e-
Shop? Read? Go to the movies? Clean the Bathroom? What would you
rather do? Ourhouse.com wants you to WIN A MAID for a year....
http://click.egroups.com/1/7017/9/_/2065/_/965654410/
--------------------------------------------------------------------e>-