[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Controlling amps that don't have a remote control
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Controlling amps that don't have a remote
control
- From: "Harrison, Mark (Alliance)" <mark.harrison@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 13:58:30 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Ah - now that's clever, because it would mean that the hi-fi electronics
could be on a separate (non X.10) spur from the control stuff...
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Doxey [mailto:keith.doxey@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 June 2000 10:42
To: ukha_d
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Controlling amps that don't have a remote control
Hi Mark,
I assume you dont want to "degrade" your kit by adding any sort
of chip to
control the volume but wish to retain a conventional pot. There are
motorised pots available from ALPS which is one approach or you can fit a
motor drive to the existing pot.
You could fit a cog or pulley of some kind to the existing shaft and mount
the drive motor above or to the side to drive the existing shaft. If you
are
worried about emf/rfi then extend the second shaft outside the rear panel
of
the amp and mount the motor externally.
You could also develop the audiophile idea a bit further similar to the
amps
which have external power supplies. Use some sort of miniature hydraulic
motor with a remote pump to control the shaft. That way the electric motor
would be nowhere near :-))
Once you have a drive motor to operate, use HomeVision or something similar
to decode the IR and operate the motor.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrison, Mark (Alliance) [mailto:mark.harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 09 June 2000 09:26
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: [ukha_d] Cotrolling amps that don't have a remote control
>
>
> Here's an interesting one for you ;-)
>
> I have some lovely John Shearne amps (http://www.shearneaudio.com/)
>
> However, they don't have a remote control. How do I automate
> the volume?
>
> The aesthetics are important, so I don't just want to fit
> some remote controlled motor to the front case. However, the
> internals are such that there's a long chrome rod that runs
> from the volume knob on the front panel to the control pot.
> on the rear
> of the circuit board, so some remote controlled motor fitted
> internally might be in order.
>
> 1: Is this viable?
> 2: Would the emf affect the sound?
> 3: Does anyone know of a suitable product?
>
> IR control is important - X.10 is not :-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Would you like to save big on your phone bill -- and keep on saving
> more each month? Join beMANY! Our huge buying group gives you
> Long Distance
> rates which fall monthly, plus an extra $60 in FREE calls!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2567/7/_/2065/_/960539300/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paying too much for Long Distance is a global problem.
Join BeMANY! and Long Distance rates fall automatically.
http://click.egroups.com/1/4260/7/_/2065/_/960543751/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds!
1. Fill in the brief application
2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
3. Get rates as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR
http://click.egroups.com/1/5197/7/_/2065/_/960555551/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|