RE: Labelling Cables - an alternative algorithm

[Chris Langridge <chrisl@xxxxxxx>]

How about not using CAT 5 for absolutely everything under the sun.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 03 December 2001 18:08
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Labelling Cables - an alternative algorithm
>
>
>Yeah yeah yeah ;-)
>
>True, though ;-)
>
>Mark Harrison
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: paulw@xxxxxxx [mailto:paulw@xxxxxxx]
>
>I find that the label printer (or at least the one I have) doesn't tend
>to
>stick to well - I'd be worried about the labels coming off during the
>pull,
>whereas a few wraps of tape are pretty permanent,
>
>I think Mark has made the explanation too verbose, and hence it looks
>worse
>that it is.   Basically.
>
>a.  No. of red loops indicate cable no. in bundle (1-4),
>b. Colour of non-red tapes indicate destination room
>c. Number of non red tapes indicate a particular quad box in the room
>(1..,
>2.. etc)
>
>-- Paul --
>
>------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>---------------------~-->
>See What You've Been Missing!
>Amazing Wireless Video Camera.
>Click here
>http://us.click.yahoo.com/75YKVC/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/IBOolB/TM
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>------~->
>
>For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
>Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>