The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: OT ATI AIW Radeon


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] BTInternet Support


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [OT] BTInternet Support
  • From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:37:52 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I'm involved in one contract at the moment, where a strip of land 1 foot
wide and 60 feet long is probably going to be valued at about =A3300,000.
The point is, it lies between Sainsbury's and a field which they want to
use as an extension to the car-park. The previous owners of the "shop
before Sainsbury's" sold 99% of their land, but retained a
"ransom
strip".

Having spent much of my working life with property developers and
builders, I don't believe that any court in the land would regard a
lowish four-figure sum as an "unreasonable" charge for allowing
trenching to be dug. I would guess that =A33-4 was reasonable, but that
=A38-9k was taking the piss.=20

As you say, a mole would be one way of tunneling, but moleing is
typically 4-5 times more expensive than cut and cover tunnelling.
Overhead wires is, again, an alternative, but telcos tend to hate them
because they get broken ;-)

That's not the main point however... the main point I was making is that
if you want cable access then DEMAND it.=20

Don't let the cable company make excuses! They'll try to flim-flam you,
but in fact they may well be obliged to provide it and NOT have ANY
RIGHT to pass on their costs to you...

Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher


-----Original Message-----
From: Tracey Gardner [mailto:tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 27 November 2001 14:12
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] BTInternet Support


Hello Mark

The cable company could undoubtedly "mole" the service so that
they wouldn't disturb your plants etc.

I think that you'll find that all the telecomms companies have
rights of access enshrined in their licences and any attempt to
extract unreasonable amounts of cash from them for access would
be frowned upon by a court, which is where any dispute would be
settled.

If they wanted to get naughty they could always erect an aerial
cable across your garden and legally you can't do a thing about
it, ISTR that it's called "flying wire" powers.

Cheers

Tracey


>I, for example, would want several thousand to allow anyone to
dig a
>hole across my garden, cutting through the roots of some
valuable
>plants, and meaning that I could never dig down again safely ;-)




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk=20
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx=20
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx=20
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx=20
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the=20
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.