The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [KAT5] Re: Wiring House (Next Step)


  • Subject: RE: [KAT5] Re: Wiring House (Next Step)
  • From: "Steve Jones" <email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:32:24 +0100

Yes it is screwfix.com.  It works for me.   Try this link
http://www.screwfix.com/app/sfd/cat/home.jsp
=20





Regards=20


Steve Jones=20
mailto:email@xxxxxxx=20


-----Original Message-----
From: Ant [mailto:ant_marsh@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 12 August 2004 17:04
To: kat5-users@xxxxxxx
Subject: [KAT5] Re: Wiring House (Next Step)


Hi Stu

Thanks for that - is their web site www.screwfix.com?

If so then it seems to be undergoing some kind of update at the moment.

Cheers
Ant

--- In kat5-users@xxxxxxx, "stuart woodhall"
<stuartwoodhall@h...> =
=3D


wrote:
> Ant
>     Screw fix seem to have some good deals on network stuff cable
patch=20
> panels and sockets
>     Its worth a look
>=20
>     Stu
>=20
>=20
> >From: "Ant" <ant_marsh@y...>
> >Reply-To: kat5-users@xxxxxxx
> >To: kat5-users@xxxxxxx
> >Subject: [KAT5] Re: Wiring House (Next Step)
> >Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:28:23 -0000
> >
> >Hi all
> >
> >Thank you for all of your replies and sorry for not responding
sooner.
> >
> >I have a few points I'd like to clarify, a few definite decisions
I've=20
> >made=3D
> >  and a few more
> >questions that I'd be keen to have your advice on.
> >
> >Clarification:
> >----------
> >1 - I guess I've been using the term "network" a little
loosely. I have =
=3D


> >ind=3D
> >eed designed
> >a structured cabling system using cat5e and nothing else run to a
centra=
=3D

l=20
> >l=3D
> >ocation and
> >not daisy-chained.
> >
> >2 - I intend to use it for LAN, audio and video and who knows what
else =
=3D

in=20
> >=3D
> >the future
> >and was simply wishing to know of any "clashes". I was
aware of potentia=
=3D

l=20
> >i=3D
> >ssues with
> >using telephones but do not intend to go down that route anyway.
> >
> >Decisions (So far):
> >---------------
> >
> >1 - Will be using cat5e.
> >2 - Currently have 32 wires throughout the entire house - am
thinking of=
=3D


> >ad=3D
> >ding a
> >few more.
> >3 - Electrician has agreed to run all cable to required points
from Node=
=3D


> >Ze=3D
> >ro and
> >fixing metal boxes to wall prior to plasterers coming in for
=A3250. I w=
il=3D

l=20
> >b=3D
> >e doing all
> >punching down and fitting of sockets etc. and supplying cable. I
thought=
=3D


> >th=3D
> >is was a
> >very good price - any comments welcome.
> >
> >Further Questions:
> >---------------
> >
> >1 - Sharing Audio - I notice you mentioned about speakers being an
issue=
=3D


> >Ke=3D
> >ith - can
> >you clarify this further regards how to use audio then? Am I right
in=20
> >think=3D
> >ing that by
> >this you mean audio should be "sent" via cat5e, for
example, to an=20
> >amplifie=3D
> >r rather
> >than speakers themselves?
> >
> >2 - "At least 4 wires to every room" - interestingly I
have done this on=
=3D


> >th=3D
> >e design
> >already although I'm still thinking about adding more. I know this
may=20
> >soun=3D
> >d daft but
> >I've got none going to any bathooms or toilets - has anyone
actually run=
=3D


> >ca=3D
> >t5e to
> >such rooms?
> >
> >3 - Is there anywhere else I might want to consider running a
cable e.g.=
=3D


> >an=3D
> >  external
> >socket?
> >
> >4 - Shielded or Unshielded cable? I really can't decide - to be on
the=20
> >safe=3D
> >  side I'd
> >prefer to go with shielded but is it really necessary for home
networkin=
=3D

g?
> >
> >5 - Can anyone recommend a good place to get bulk cable from (will
need =
=3D

a=20
> >g=3D
> >ood
> >400-500 metres) and double RJ45 sockets etc.? Have so far been
looking a=
=3D

t=20
> >B=3D
> >  and Q
> >(www.diy.com) and dabs.com
> >
> >Once again, thank you for all of your comments - has all been
extremely =
=3D


> >use=3D
> >ful.
> >
> >:o)
> >Ant
> >
> >
> >--- In kat5-users@xxxxxxx, "Ant" <ant_marsh@y...>
wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I've been doing quite a bit of reading around and still have
a few=20
> >questi=3D
> >ons left that
> >I
> > > can't seem to find a conclusive answer for....I'm hoping
this will be=
=3D


> >the=3D
> >  place to get
> > > those answers!!
> > >
> > > I am not really wanting to flood wire the house with
different types =
=3D

of=20
> >c=3D
> >able and am
> > > convinced that I can do all I want by running plenty of
network cable=
=3D


> >and=3D
> >  sockets -
> > > my feelings of whether or not this is a feasible option have
been=20
> >greatly=3D
> >  boosted by
> > > finding KAT5!!
> > >
> > > 1 - Should I opt for cat 5e or cat 6 cable? I know the
latter will be=
=3D


> >mor=3D
> >e expensive
> >but
> > > it will potentially be more futureproof. Does anyone have
any experie=
=3D

nce=20
> >=3D
> >with cat
> >6?
> > >
> > > 2 - If I went with cat 6 would the KAT5 modules work okay?
> > >
> > > 3 - Can I use the same "network" for both data and
audio/video or is =
=3D

it=20
> >b=3D
> >etter to
> >use
> > > patch panels and create separate networks?
> > >
> > > 4 - I'm not allowed to wire the house myself prior to it
being handed=
=3D


> >ove=3D
> >r to me
> > > (health and safety and all that). The electrician has
offered to put =
=3D

it=20
> >i=3D
> >n (although
> >can't
> > > give me a price until I give him a detailed diagram). Has
anyone else=
=3D


> >tak=3D
> >en this
> >route
> > > and what advice can they give?
> > >
> > > Looking forward to your help/advice!
> > >
> > > Thank you. :o)
> > >
> > > Ant
> >
>=20
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/my=
=3D

emo



Searchable KAT5 archive can be found at
http://www.ukha-archive.com/=20




KAT5 Main Index | KAT5 Thread Index | KAT5 Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.